Australian Library and Information Association
home > seminars > digital.amnesia2005 > Evidence of e-government
 

Digital amnesia: challenges of government online

Making, keeping and using the evidence of e-government

Adrian Cunningham National Archives of Australia

This talk will cover:

  • NAA strategic approach to digital recordkeeping in government
  • Role of resource discovery metadata - AGLS
  • Policy and guidelines for archiving web resources
  • Archival preservation and access

E-permanence and all that

  • In the late 1990s the NAA repositioned itself as a proactive enabler of good recordkeeping in agencies, providing standards and guidelines to improve the behaviour of records creators and the quality of information systems in government
  • Response to deteriorating recordkeeping practices and the challenge of the digital workplace
  • Conceptual framework based on ISO 15489

Australian government locator service (AGLS)

agls logo

The objectives of AGLS

  • To improve the visibility and accessibility of government information and services through the standardisation of web based descriptions
  • To enable web based search engines to do their job with greater precision and efficiency
  • To help ensure that those searching the web are presented with relevant and meaningful 'hits' in response to search requests

AGLS and Dublin Core

  • AGLS is based on, but extends, the international 'Dublin Core' metadata standard (ISO 15836)
  • Importance of interoperability between AGLS and Dublin Core
  • AGLS can itself be extended for specific purposes

Five additional AGLS elements

  • Function
    • Describes the function/s of government to which the resource relates
  • Availability
    • Provides information on how offline resources may be obtained
  • Mandate (Legislative mandate for the resource)
  • Audience (Target audiences for the resource)
  • Accessibility (Compliance with W3C guidelines)

AGLS is simple, flexible and dynamic

  • Only six of the 20 elements are mandatory (Creator; Date; Title; Subject or Function; Identifier; Publisher)
  • AGLS metadata can be created at point of document creation, but can be added to and improved as documents evolve
  • AGLS metadata can be linked to single items or to aggregates of resources

Implementations since 1998

  • Endorsed by the Online Council
  • Mandated in Tasmania, South Aust, Qld
  • C'wealth 'GovOnline' Mandate, April 2000
  • Victorian Online Gateway Project, 2002/03
  • Local governments getting started
  • New Zealand's adoption of NZGLS

Other developments since 1998

  • Portals strategy reliance on metadata - Business Entry Point, HealthInsite, etc
  • AGLS very visible within DCMI internationally
  • XML schema definitions
  • ANZLIC-ISO19115/AGLS mapping
  • Tim Berners-Lee and the 'Semantic web'
  • Publication as AS 5044 in 2002

Current issues for AGLS

  • The need for both metadata and full-text (ie Google) search capabilities, its not an either/or choice
  • Life beyond harvest control lists
  • Supporting the implementation of quality metadata across the Australian Government
  • Search engine support
  • Multiples uses of metadata and demonstrating returns on investment

AGLS now involves co-operation between:

  • The National Archives
  • Australian Government Information Management Office
  • Online council officials
  • AGLS working group
  • Standards Australia

Recordkeeping issues for web resources

  • Is a web site a publication or record?
  • Can an agency be held accountable for something it had on its web site a year ago?
  • How do we capture and maintain records of web-based activity?
  • No single 'rule' exists to cover all types of scenarios

Diversity of web resources

  • Static websites/resources
  • Static websites/resources with form-based interactivity
  • Web sites/resources based on dynamic data access
  • Dynamically-generated websites/resources

NAA web archiving guidelines

  • Responsibilities
  • Diversity of web-based resources
  • Fundamentals of good web-based recordkeeping
  • Risk assessment
  • Strategic and technological options
  • Storage and preservation issues
  • Determining the best option

Assessing risk

Factors to consider:

  • Public visibility of the agency
  • Purpose of the web site
  • Complexity of the web site
  • Frequency and regularity of content change
  • Risk of litigation

Object or event driven approaches

Managing the 'objects' that constitute or are made available via a web site

and/or

Capturing 'events' or transactions that occur between the website and the user

Appraisal of web resources

  • Web objects can be sentenced under the AFDA 'publication' function
  • Records of events/transactions should be sentenced under the appropriate function/activity, usually in an agency records disposal authority
  • Archival value records can be transferred to NAA, unless they have been taken into PANDORA

Archival preservation and access

  • The vital importance of having a strategy for ensuring the integrity, durability, security, useability, evidential meaning and authenticity of digital records
  • This is not just an afterthought - it requires a major commitment and serious resources
  • A preservation strategy is a pre-requisite for long-term access to digital object
  • OAIS Reference Model - ISO 14721 (2003)

NAA digital preservation strategy

  • Uses open source XML technology to wrap and store 'normalised' digital records created in proprietary data formats
  • Standard archival data formats for use with digital records that are required for long-term retention and access (producing authentic, reliable, inviolable and durable digital preservation masters + access copies)
  • Xena version 2.0 tools for normalising digital records, due May 2005
  • NAA digital repository/laboratory in place

Resources


prevtop
http://conferences.alia.org.au/seminars/digital.amnesia2005/evidence.html
© ALIA [ feedback | update | site map | privacy ] it.rm 6:03am 27 February 2010